The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has defended its decision to appeal two Federal High Court rulings that challenged parts of its 2027 General Election Timetable, saying the legal action is necessary to ensure coordinated and orderly electoral processes.
INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, SAN, explained on Tuesday, 9 June 2026, at a quarterly consultative meeting with political party leaders in Abuja, that the absence of harmonised timelines could create uncertainty and undermine the Commission’s constitutional mandate.
The appeals follow two recent judgments: Youth Party v. INEC (20 May 2026) and Social Democratic Party v. INEC (26 May 2026).
While the courts affirmed INEC’s authority to issue an electoral timetable, certain timelines, particularly for nomination and substitution of candidates, were nullified.
Prof. Amupitan said: “The activities in the timetable are interrelated operational processes essential to the orderly conduct of elections. The Commission must harmonise all electoral activities — including verification of party membership registers, monitoring of primaries, pre-uploading of results, printing of ballots and result sheets, BVAS configuration, and statutory inspections — within a coherent framework that promotes transparency, efficiency, and equal treatment for all parties.”
He reassured the public that despite the pending appeals, INEC remains committed to conducting the 2027 General Election in strict compliance with the Constitution and Electoral Act.
On preparations for the Ekiti State Governorship Election on 20 June 2026, Prof. Amupitan said the state register now contains 1,059,360 voters, with 66,664 new registrants added since 2023.
He confirmed that 2,103 double registrations were invalidated, and that logistics, technology deployment, and training of election officials are all on schedule for the simultaneous opening of 2,445 polling units at 8:30 a.m. on election day.
The Chairman urged political parties to cooperate with INEC to ensure a smooth, credible, and transparent electoral process.
Comments
Add a comment